Solution
We'll prove this by induction on on the relaxed problem: we'll prove the statement such that product of any two neighbors is of the form for some integer , which proves the original problem. The result is clearly true for . Now, assume that the result is true for any , where . We'll prove that this is true for . Indeed, suppose that there exists a configuration for with , otherwise we are done. Call a number of the form for some as nice. Now, take the largest prime on this set . By assumption, there exists distinct primes such that
Claim 01. is nice.
Proof. By maximality of , we have and furthermore
As , we conclude that . Now, we have
and since is odd, then . Write for some .
Therefore, we have
We thus conclude that has to be nice as well.
The above claim implies that we can construct a valid configuration with assuming that a valid configuration with exists; and by inductive hypothesis, there exists a unique valid configuration for , by deleting the largest prime. Therefore, the valid configuration for can only be obtained by inserting between any two consecutive primes in the configuration for . Now, suppose there are more than one ways to insert the prime, then there exists distinct and such that
However, as , we have as well. Furthermore, as are distinct, then are distinct as well. Therefore, , a contradiction. Therefore, the configuration for has to be unique as well, and hence our original result holds.
|